I have a NAS (Network Attached Storage) device on my home network. This file-server-in-a-box provides a convenient place for family members to store and backup their data to a location that can be accessed from any computer in the house. There are a few file shares on this device that are public -- meaning any computer on the network (belonging to either friends or family) can access them. In addition to these public file shares, each family member has their own password-protected share to which they can save files they don't want available to everyone else.
The NAS device came with software that was advertised to automatically copy files from computers on the network to the file server each time they are modified. When I purchased the NAS device, I planned to use this feature to provide backups in case of data loss and to provide some automated versioning of files. I installed this software on my notebook computer and configured it to monitor a handful of directories to be versioned and backed up to my private file share on the NAS box.
However, there's a problem...

The backup software appears to be properly detecting file changes and attempts to backup data to the file share. However, it fails to write versioned backups to the NAS device. Each time it attempts to save a file, an error is written to a log file stating "Unable to copy file: Access is denied."
It appears that the backup software that came with the NAS device cannot write to password-protected shares on the NAS device. It only backs up data to unprotected public shares. Saving share passwords to the Windows XP Home network password list doesn't seem to help.
Who designed NAS backup software that doesn't support saving data to password-protected file shares? Did no designer, developer, or tester consider that users might want to backup to non-public shares?
when software discombobulates
20090228
Entered by: Ben Simo
Access is denied
Entered by: Ben Simo
20090227
Entered by: Ben Simo
Choose a Department
I'm looking for a book. I go to Amazon perform a search based on the author's name. I don't see what I'm looking for on the first page of results and want to change the sorting of the results. Instead of a sort option, there's a Department link with a message stating "Choose a Department to enable sorting." So I click the link to select a department.
Wow! So many options. I guess I'll select Books.

Is there a problem here? Am I expecting too much to think the Amazon search engine might show me sortable book results if all the results for my search are books? Might sending me to book results create a new problem?
Entered by: Ben Simo
883 = 641 + 2613
Do the math!
883 total invitations sent. 641 opened and 2613 unopened?
Displaying 1-100 of 743 opened. I thought it said there were 641 opened.
The numbers just don't add up.
And to top it all off, the names and addresses displayed to me (blurred in the image above) are not all from my invite lists. It looks like I'm being shown data belonging to other Eventbrite customers.
20090226
Entered by: Ben Simo
Entered by: Ben Simo
Entered by: Ben Simo
Show me the way to go home
Checking out a TV Guide site.
Want to see what's on tomorrow but mistakenly hit the Thursday link.
Occured or occurred? Go home? How?
Submitted by Phil Kirkham
20090225
Entered by: Zachary Fisher
Entered by: Ben Simo
How to inspire confidence

Trying again works in many cases? And when it doesn't: try again, again? Wonder if their cars come with similar instructions.
Submitted by Dale Emery
Entered by: Ben Simo
How many times must I login?

Firefox 3 displays a proxy login dialog for every tab that accesses data outside the corporate intranet. This is quite annoying. (Firefox 2 only prompted to login to the proxy once -- no matter how many tabs were being opened.)
20090224
Entered by: Ben Simo
Loading...
Entered by: Ben Simo
Quick, hide the computer before the cops come!
Back when I did software tutoring for new computer users, I got more repeat questions about this Windows 95/98 dialog than anything else.
Did I break the law? I didn't mean to do anything illegal. What did I do? Am I in trouble? Is Microsoft going to report me to the police? I'm afraid to use my computer. I don't want to be an accidental law breaker.
When software incorrectly leads users to believe they've done something illegal, I say there's a problem here.
Entered by: Ben Simo
20090223
Entered by: Ben Simo
To block or to reset? What is the question?
I click the Block button in response to a Windows AntiSpyware Notice. I then get a dialog that I assume is intended to confirm my selection.
20090222
Entered by: Ben Simo
Blocked Title
It appears that there is no way to view the title without unlocking the program. So, I enter my parental control password to see the unknown program with a blocked title. (If my children were in the room with me, how would I know if it was okay to unlock the box?)
After entering my password, I can view the program but the DVR still shows 'Blocked Title' as the name of the program. I still don't know what I am watching. Why can I see the program but not the title?

After watching for a little while, I realize the program is the movie Alien. Why is the title still blocked after the parental controls are unlocked and I'm watching the program?
20090220
Entered by: Ben Simo
Entered by: Ben Simo
20090219
Entered by: Ben Simo
Entered by: Zachary Fisher
10 PRINT "Is There A Problem Here?" : GOTO 10
If being an American has taught me anything, it is that voting counts.
If being an American has taught me anything else, it is that anything worth doing is worth over-doing.
Case in point, voting our opinions on this site. Could I simply choose EVERY option and save my votes?
If you said yes, send me your address and I'll send you a Lee Greenwood CD***.
Mention in Passing:
It was not obvious how to commit my vote. My American know-how turns to mush in the absence of a submit button.
Also, pretend you are visually impaired and require the text size to be quite large. As you increase the size of text, you will notice that the iframe containing the voting options will begin to clip, disallowing certain options from being seen.
***No. I Won't.
Entered by: Ben Simo
20090218
Entered by: Zachary Fisher
Entered by: Ben Simo
20090217
Entered by: Pradeep Soundararajan
Entered by: Zachary Fisher
Entered by: Ben Simo
Yes, there is a problem here.
Only a few days after launching this blog, I hit the main URL of http://blog.isthereaproblemhere.com/ and find that there are no stories. I see that my browser is warning me of some code errors on the page. I haven't made any code changes that I can remember since I last saw it working. So I investigate. The last change I made was to some sidebar text. So I go look at that sidebar text and I find the problem.
Blogger's HTML/JavaScript editor apparently has a feature that automatically inserts
tags in the middle of JavaScript code if the Rich Text link is clicked. My looking at sidebar text in the Rich Text editor broke the JavaScript code. :(
20090216
Entered by: Ben Simo
20090215
Entered by: Ben Simo
Entered by: Ben Simo
20090214
Entered by: Ben Simo
Entered by: Ben Simo
Entered by: Ben Simo
Entered by: Ben Simo
Entered by: Ben Simo
I live there. How can it be invalid?
Apparently Colorado Springs is not a valid city because it is abbreviated in the database. It took many failed attempts to get it abbreviated just like the system wanted. Anyone that lives in a city with a name containing more than 13 characters has to know how their city is abbreviated in an unseen database.
Comment








7 Comments












2 Comment






